![]() ![]() It also runs well no matter how many tabs you have past indexing phase. Automated refactoring is just that much smarter too with a lot of shorthand features. As for customization, live templates allows you to create your own "snippets" depending on your code style standards. VS code plugin equivalents are still unreliable garbage in that regard. Local history cache is amazing and sometimes can save your arse tons of time. Not an issue if you're working in small teams or solo though. So git integration is simply first class, vs code still has long way to go. In my estimation the real value of webstorm comes from common jetbrain platform, not from javascript specific tooling. And it's quick to start, but that's where the snappyness ends, quick start up time was what VS code optimized for, I'm sure you can still find the talk about it's creation on youtube. So I completely understand that some people don't see much of an issue in it. Take away typescript and you'll notice that webstorm is quite a bit smarter and accurate. Although I notice the autocompletion is not as context aware and you still get global jank in suggestions even with all the plugins. It's also quite smart regarding typescript. And I use it as well, namely for quickly opening configuration files in yaml. And in many contexts VS code is absolutely great tool. The question is what makes you more productive. Well, all you need is a notepad, if we talking in needs. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |